Tuesday, August 11, 2026
LIVEThe Unrelenting Cyber Battle: Hacking Threats and the Imperative of Robust Data Protection///Navigating the Cyber Labyrinth: Bolstering Defenses Against Evolving Hacking Threats///The Dual Front War: Battling Hacking and Bolstering Data Protection in the Digital Age///The Ever-Evolving Cyber Threat Landscape: Navigating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///The Unseen Battle: Fortifying Data in an Age of Relentless Hacking///The Unseen War: Hacking's Relentless Advance and the Imperative of Data Protection///The Evolving Threat Landscape: Hacking, Data Protection, and the Imperative for Proactive Security///Navigating the Digital Minefield: Bolstering Data Protection in an Era of Relentless Hacking///The Dual Fronts of Digital Defense: Combating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///Hacking's New Frontier: Fortifying Data Protection in the Age of Advanced Cyber Threats///The Dual Front: Navigating Hacking Threats and Fortifying Data Protection in the Digital Age///Navigating the Digital Gauntlet: The Evolving Nexus of Hacking and Data Protection///The Unrelenting Cyber Battle: Hacking Threats and the Imperative of Robust Data Protection///Navigating the Cyber Labyrinth: Bolstering Defenses Against Evolving Hacking Threats///The Dual Front War: Battling Hacking and Bolstering Data Protection in the Digital Age///The Ever-Evolving Cyber Threat Landscape: Navigating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///The Unseen Battle: Fortifying Data in an Age of Relentless Hacking///The Unseen War: Hacking's Relentless Advance and the Imperative of Data Protection///The Evolving Threat Landscape: Hacking, Data Protection, and the Imperative for Proactive Security///Navigating the Digital Minefield: Bolstering Data Protection in an Era of Relentless Hacking///The Dual Fronts of Digital Defense: Combating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///Hacking's New Frontier: Fortifying Data Protection in the Age of Advanced Cyber Threats///The Dual Front: Navigating Hacking Threats and Fortifying Data Protection in the Digital Age///Navigating the Digital Gauntlet: The Evolving Nexus of Hacking and Data Protection///
Subscribe
Cyber Security
Independent · Digital
Thehackingpost
CybersecurityAI-assisted

Apple Settles for $25M on Illegal Hiring Discrimination Allegations

Federal law enforcement forced Apple to put $18.25 million towards folks who tried to join the company’s staff, but were rebuffed due to the company ignoring job applications sent online. While feds claimed Apple was trying to favor current…

Federal law enforcement forced Apple to put $18.25 million towards folks who tried to join the company’s staff, but were rebuffed due to the company ignoring job applications sent online. While feds claimed Apple was trying to favor current workers on temporary visas, the tech giant said it was just one big misunderstanding.

WatchThe M3 MacBook Pro: Made Dark for Halloween CCShare SubtitlesOffEnglishThe DoJ says the tech giant wasn’t advertising jobs on its external hiring website, and it also forced some workers to mail paper applications versus letting them do the same thing over the internet, and the company wouldn’t even consider those applications if a hopeful worker filed them electronically. This was all in an effort to favor Apple workers holding temporary visas over other jobseekers.Advertisement“These less effective recruitment procedures nearly always resulted in few or no applications to PERM positions from applicants whose permission to work does not expire,” the DOJ said in its release.AdvertisementApple already fixed some of its recruitment practices after feds started their investigation back in 2019. Still, officials now require that Apple post its PERM positions to its job site and accept electronic applications.Apple still disagrees with the Department of Labor’s conclusion about its misconduct, according to the settlement papers. Instead, the Cupertino company claimed any failures to comply with the hiring law “were the result of inadvertent error and not intentional discrimination.” Of course, Apple is not admitting any guilt regarding its hiring practices, though it will need to report any new PERM hires to the DOJ twice a year.AdvertisementGizmodo reached out to Apple, but we did not immediately hear back. A company spokesperson told CNBC that it had “unintentionally” not been following the DOJ’s standards, and that it was already implementing its remediation plan.The $25 million breaks down into $6.75 million in civil penalties, while the rest will go into a back pay fund for all those “eligible” would-be workers. The DOJ is forcing Apple to any of the folks who may have been deterred from applying to its jobs and who were not considered because of its obtuse hiring practices. Claimants who get a note from Apple will be able to file their requests to a fund-specific website whenever the company gets around to creating one.

While feds claimed Apple was trying to favor current workers on temporary visas, the tech giant said it was just one big misunderstanding.
Kyle Mercer · Thehackingpost

Based on reporting by gizmodo.com.

Advertisement
AI transparency. This article was produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and published under human editorial oversight. AI systems can make mistakes. Read how we use AI (EU AI Act, Art. 50).
Related Stories