Tuesday, August 11, 2026
LIVEThe Unrelenting Cyber Battle: Hacking Threats and the Imperative of Robust Data Protection///Navigating the Cyber Labyrinth: Bolstering Defenses Against Evolving Hacking Threats///The Dual Front War: Battling Hacking and Bolstering Data Protection in the Digital Age///The Ever-Evolving Cyber Threat Landscape: Navigating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///The Unseen Battle: Fortifying Data in an Age of Relentless Hacking///The Unseen War: Hacking's Relentless Advance and the Imperative of Data Protection///The Evolving Threat Landscape: Hacking, Data Protection, and the Imperative for Proactive Security///Navigating the Digital Minefield: Bolstering Data Protection in an Era of Relentless Hacking///The Dual Fronts of Digital Defense: Combating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///Hacking's New Frontier: Fortifying Data Protection in the Age of Advanced Cyber Threats///The Dual Front: Navigating Hacking Threats and Fortifying Data Protection in the Digital Age///Navigating the Digital Gauntlet: The Evolving Nexus of Hacking and Data Protection///The Unrelenting Cyber Battle: Hacking Threats and the Imperative of Robust Data Protection///Navigating the Cyber Labyrinth: Bolstering Defenses Against Evolving Hacking Threats///The Dual Front War: Battling Hacking and Bolstering Data Protection in the Digital Age///The Ever-Evolving Cyber Threat Landscape: Navigating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///The Unseen Battle: Fortifying Data in an Age of Relentless Hacking///The Unseen War: Hacking's Relentless Advance and the Imperative of Data Protection///The Evolving Threat Landscape: Hacking, Data Protection, and the Imperative for Proactive Security///Navigating the Digital Minefield: Bolstering Data Protection in an Era of Relentless Hacking///The Dual Fronts of Digital Defense: Combating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///Hacking's New Frontier: Fortifying Data Protection in the Age of Advanced Cyber Threats///The Dual Front: Navigating Hacking Threats and Fortifying Data Protection in the Digital Age///Navigating the Digital Gauntlet: The Evolving Nexus of Hacking and Data Protection///
Subscribe
Cyber Security
Independent · Digital
Thehackingpost
CybersecurityAI-assisted

CISA Warns of XWiki Platform Injection vulnerability Exploited to Execute Remote Code

The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has issued an urgent warning about a severe injection vulnerability in the XWiki Platform, designated as CVE-2025-24893 .

The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has issued an urgent warning about a severe injection vulnerability in the XWiki Platform, designated as CVE-2025-24893 .

This flaw allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary remote code, posing significant risks to organizations using the open-source wiki software.

Discovered and actively exploited, the vulnerability underscores the dangers of eval injection in web applications , particularly those handling search functionalities.

XWiki, a popular platform for collaborative content management, suffers from this eval injection issue in its SolrSearch feature. Attackers can exploit it without logging in, potentially compromising entire installations.

CISA added the CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on October 30, 2025, emphasizing the need for immediate action amid reports of real-world exploitation.

While it’s unclear if ransomware groups are leveraging it specifically, the flaw’s severity aligns with tactics seen in broader campaigns targeting content management systems.

At its core, CVE-2025-24893 stems from improper handling of user input in the SolrSearch endpoint, classified under CWE-95 for improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. Any guest user can send a crafted request to trigger code execution.

This flaw allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary remote code, posing significant risks to organizations using the open-source wiki software.
Megan Forbes · Thehackingpost

For instance, a simple test involves accessing the SolrSearch RSS feed with a payload like %7D%7D%7D%7B%7Basync async=false%7D%7D%7B%7Bgroovy%7D%7Dprintln(“Hello from” + ” search text:” + (23 + 19))%7B%7B/groovy%7D%7D%7B%7B/async%7D%7D. If the response includes “Hello from search text:42” in the RSS title, the instance is vulnerable.

The impact is devastating: complete remote code execution undermines confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Attackers could steal data, deploy malware, or pivot to other systems.

Affected versions include those prior to the patches, primarily impacting enterprise users in education, government, and corporate sectors who rely on XWiki for internal knowledge bases.

CVE IDDescriptionAffected Products/VersionsCVSS 3.1 ScoreCWEExploitation StatusCVE-2025-24893Eval injection in SolrSearch allowing arbitrary RCEXWiki Platform Mitigations

CISA urges users to promptly apply vendor mitigations, adhere to Binding Operational Directive 22-01 for cloud services , or discontinue use of the product if patches are unavailable.

Advertisement

XWiki has released fixes in versions 15.10.11, 16.4.1, and 16.5.0RC1, which sanitize inputs and prevent eval execution.

As a temporary workaround, administrators can modify the Main.SolrSearchMacros file, specifically line 955, to enforce an application/xml content type for the rawResponse macro, mirroring the template’s secure output handling.

This blocks malicious payloads without a full upgrade. Organizations should also monitor logs for suspicious SolrSearch requests and restrict guest access where possible.

This incident highlights the ongoing threats to legacy web platforms. With exploitation confirmed, swift patching remains critical to safeguard sensitive environments.

Follow us on Google News , LinkedIn , and X for daily cybersecurity updates. Contact us to feature your stories.

Based on reporting by Cyber Security News.

AI transparency. This article was produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and published under human editorial oversight. AI systems can make mistakes. Read how we use AI (EU AI Act, Art. 50).
Related Stories