Tuesday, August 11, 2026
LIVEThe Unrelenting Cyber Battle: Hacking Threats and the Imperative of Robust Data Protection///Navigating the Cyber Labyrinth: Bolstering Defenses Against Evolving Hacking Threats///The Dual Front War: Battling Hacking and Bolstering Data Protection in the Digital Age///The Ever-Evolving Cyber Threat Landscape: Navigating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///The Unseen Battle: Fortifying Data in an Age of Relentless Hacking///The Unseen War: Hacking's Relentless Advance and the Imperative of Data Protection///The Evolving Threat Landscape: Hacking, Data Protection, and the Imperative for Proactive Security///Navigating the Digital Minefield: Bolstering Data Protection in an Era of Relentless Hacking///The Dual Fronts of Digital Defense: Combating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///Hacking's New Frontier: Fortifying Data Protection in the Age of Advanced Cyber Threats///The Dual Front: Navigating Hacking Threats and Fortifying Data Protection in the Digital Age///Navigating the Digital Gauntlet: The Evolving Nexus of Hacking and Data Protection///The Unrelenting Cyber Battle: Hacking Threats and the Imperative of Robust Data Protection///Navigating the Cyber Labyrinth: Bolstering Defenses Against Evolving Hacking Threats///The Dual Front War: Battling Hacking and Bolstering Data Protection in the Digital Age///The Ever-Evolving Cyber Threat Landscape: Navigating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///The Unseen Battle: Fortifying Data in an Age of Relentless Hacking///The Unseen War: Hacking's Relentless Advance and the Imperative of Data Protection///The Evolving Threat Landscape: Hacking, Data Protection, and the Imperative for Proactive Security///Navigating the Digital Minefield: Bolstering Data Protection in an Era of Relentless Hacking///The Dual Fronts of Digital Defense: Combating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///Hacking's New Frontier: Fortifying Data Protection in the Age of Advanced Cyber Threats///The Dual Front: Navigating Hacking Threats and Fortifying Data Protection in the Digital Age///Navigating the Digital Gauntlet: The Evolving Nexus of Hacking and Data Protection///
Subscribe
Cyber Security
Independent · Digital
Thehackingpost
CybersecurityAI-assisted

Economy|BanksRepublican lawmakers break from US president on Fed chair indictmentFormer Federal Reserve chairs called the indictment an ‘unprecedented attempt’ to undermine the independence of the US central bank in a joint letter.

United States Senator Lisa Murkowski has announced her support for a proposal by Republican Thom Tillis to oppose the nomination of President Donald Trump's Federal Reserve candidates. This follows the Justice Department's recent threat to indict Federal…

United States Senator Lisa Murkowski has announced her support for a proposal by Republican Thom Tillis to oppose the nomination of President Donald Trump's Federal Reserve candidates. This follows the Justice Department's recent threat to indict Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell.

Murkowski emphasized the importance of Federal Reserve independence, stating, "The stakes are too high to look the other way: if the Federal Reserve loses its independence, the stability of our markets and the broader economy will suffer."

Murkowski, one of the few Republicans willing to occasionally vote against the President's preferences, noted the significance of maintaining the Federal Reserve's autonomy. President Trump has been vocal in urging the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates, challenging the traditional separation of the central bank from political influence in order to focus on economic data.

In a recent conversation with Powell, Murkowski was informed that the Federal Reserve had received subpoenas, which Powell described as pretexts for influencing interest rate decisions. Murkowski criticized the Justice Department's actions as coercive, suggesting that congressional investigation may be necessary if the department's focus on the Federal Reserve is due to typical cost overruns.

Kevin Hassett, White House economic adviser, is considered a potential candidate to succeed Powell when his term concludes in May. Hassett expressed skepticism regarding Powell's testimony about the Federal Reserve's new building construction, the subject of the Justice Department's investigation.

This follows the Justice Department's recent threat to indict Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell.
Mark Jensen · Thehackingpost

Hassett commented on CNBC's Squawk Box about the Justice Department's interest in the building's cost overruns, stating, "Right now, we’ve got a building that’s got like, dramatic cost overruns and plans for the buildings that look inconsistent with the testimony, but again, I’m not a Justice Department person. I hope everything turns out OK for Jay."

Later, Hassett indicated he would support the investigation if he were leading the Federal Reserve, describing the Justice Department's actions as a response to the building's unprecedented costs in Washington.

President Trump, who has consistently advocated for more substantial interest rate cuts, stated on his Truth Social platform in December, "The United States should be rewarded for SUCCESS, not brought down by it. Anybody that disagrees with me will never be the Fed Chairman!"

Former heads of the US Federal Reserve, including Janet Yellen, Ben Bernanke, and Alan Greenspan, alongside other ex-economic policy leaders, have denounced the Trump administration's investigation into Powell. They argue that such actions threaten the Federal Reserve's independence, a characteristic more commonly seen in countries with weaker institutions.

Advertisement

The statement from former Fed chairs highlighted the unprecedented nature of the criminal inquiry into Powell, emphasizing its potential to undermine the Federal Reserve's independence. They warned against the erosion of the rule of law, which they identified as a cornerstone of the United States' economic system.

The statement was supported by 10 other former senior economic policymakers from both Republican and Democratic administrations.

Based on reporting by Al Jazeera.

AI transparency. This article was produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and published under human editorial oversight. AI systems can make mistakes. Read how we use AI (EU AI Act, Art. 50).
Related Stories