Tuesday, August 11, 2026
LIVEThe Unrelenting Cyber Battle: Hacking Threats and the Imperative of Robust Data Protection///Navigating the Cyber Labyrinth: Bolstering Defenses Against Evolving Hacking Threats///The Dual Front War: Battling Hacking and Bolstering Data Protection in the Digital Age///The Ever-Evolving Cyber Threat Landscape: Navigating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///The Unseen Battle: Fortifying Data in an Age of Relentless Hacking///The Unseen War: Hacking's Relentless Advance and the Imperative of Data Protection///The Evolving Threat Landscape: Hacking, Data Protection, and the Imperative for Proactive Security///Navigating the Digital Minefield: Bolstering Data Protection in an Era of Relentless Hacking///The Dual Fronts of Digital Defense: Combating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///Hacking's New Frontier: Fortifying Data Protection in the Age of Advanced Cyber Threats///The Dual Front: Navigating Hacking Threats and Fortifying Data Protection in the Digital Age///Navigating the Digital Gauntlet: The Evolving Nexus of Hacking and Data Protection///The Unrelenting Cyber Battle: Hacking Threats and the Imperative of Robust Data Protection///Navigating the Cyber Labyrinth: Bolstering Defenses Against Evolving Hacking Threats///The Dual Front War: Battling Hacking and Bolstering Data Protection in the Digital Age///The Ever-Evolving Cyber Threat Landscape: Navigating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///The Unseen Battle: Fortifying Data in an Age of Relentless Hacking///The Unseen War: Hacking's Relentless Advance and the Imperative of Data Protection///The Evolving Threat Landscape: Hacking, Data Protection, and the Imperative for Proactive Security///Navigating the Digital Minefield: Bolstering Data Protection in an Era of Relentless Hacking///The Dual Fronts of Digital Defense: Combating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///Hacking's New Frontier: Fortifying Data Protection in the Age of Advanced Cyber Threats///The Dual Front: Navigating Hacking Threats and Fortifying Data Protection in the Digital Age///Navigating the Digital Gauntlet: The Evolving Nexus of Hacking and Data Protection///
Subscribe
Cyber Security
Independent · Digital
Thehackingpost
CybersecurityAI-assisted

MITRE Unveils 2025’s Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses

MITRE has released its annual Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses list for 2025. This list identifies critical vulnerabilities affecting software development globally.

MITRE has released its annual Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses list for 2025. This list identifies critical vulnerabilities affecting software development globally.

The analysis utilizes over 39,080 CVE records, offering security professionals and developers insights to enhance their defenses.

The 2025 MITRE list highlights significant changes in the vulnerability landscape. Cross-site Scripting (XSS) remains the most prevalent weakness. SQL Injection has risen to the second position, indicating ongoing risks from injection-based attacks.

Missing Authorization has moved up five positions to fourth place, indicating increased concerns about access control in modern applications.

Memory safety vulnerabilities, such as Out-of-bounds Write, use-after-free, Out-of-bounds Read , and various buffer overflow types, are prominent. These weaknesses can compromise system integrity and facilitate data theft.

OS Command Injection , ranked ninth, leads with 20 Known Exploited Vulnerabilities entries, making it the most actively exploited weakness.

Authentication and authorization failures are gaining prominence. Beyond Missing Authorization, Missing Authentication for Critical Functions ranks 21st with 11 KEV entries, highlighting gaps in securing sensitive operations.

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key debuts at rank 24, showcasing new attack vectors exploiting flawed permission mechanisms.

Despite being common, Out-of-bounds Read declined from rank six to eight. Additionally, Improper Input Validation fell from rank 12 to 18, suggesting improved awareness in validation practices.

Emerging weaknesses, such as Classic Buffer Overflow and Heap-based Buffer Overflow , continue to present memory safety challenges.

Rank CWE ID Weakness CVEs in KEV Previous Rank

1 79 Cross-site Scripting (XSS) 7 1

2 89 SQL Injection 4 3 ↑1

3 352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) 0 4 ↑1

MITRE has released its annual Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses list for 2025.
Benjamin Scott · Thehackingpost

4 862 Missing Authorization 0 9 ↑5

5 787 Out-of-bounds Write 12 2 ↓3

6 22 Path Traversal 10 5 ↓1

7 416 Use After Free 14 8 ↑1

8 125 Out-of-bounds Read 3 6 ↓2

9 78 OS Command Injection 20 7 ↓2

10 94 Code Injection 7 11 ↑1

11 120 Classic Buffer Overflow 0 N/A

12 434 Unrestricted File Upload 4 10 ↓2

13 476 NULL Pointer Dereference 0 21 ↑8

14 121 Stack-based Buffer Overflow 4 N/A

15 502 Deserialization of Untrusted Data 11 16 ↑1

Advertisement

16 122 Heap-based Buffer Overflow 6 N/A

17 863 Incorrect Authorization 4 18 ↑1

18 20 Improper Input Validation 2 12 ↓6

19 284 Improper Access Control 1 N/A

20 200 Exposure of Sensitive Information 1 17 ↓3

21 306 Missing Authentication 11 25 ↑4

22 918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) 0 19 ↓3

23 77 Command Injection 2 13 ↓10

24 639 Authorization Bypass (User-Controlled Key) 0 30 ↑6

25 770 Resource Allocation Without Limits 0 26 ↑1

MITRE emphasizes that this list serves as a strategic guide for reducing vulnerabilities, achieving cost savings, conducting trend analysis, and assessing exploitability.

Understanding these root causes enables organizations to implement targeted security investments, refine software development lifecycles, and eliminate vulnerabilities prior to deployment.

The 2025 CWE Top 25 allows developers and security teams to prioritize remediation efforts, focusing resources on addressing the most exploitable vulnerabilities in production environments.

Based on reporting by GBHackers.

AI transparency. This article was produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and published under human editorial oversight. AI systems can make mistakes. Read how we use AI (EU AI Act, Art. 50).
Related Stories