Tuesday, August 11, 2026
LIVEThe Unrelenting Cyber Battle: Hacking Threats and the Imperative of Robust Data Protection///Navigating the Cyber Labyrinth: Bolstering Defenses Against Evolving Hacking Threats///The Dual Front War: Battling Hacking and Bolstering Data Protection in the Digital Age///The Ever-Evolving Cyber Threat Landscape: Navigating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///The Unseen Battle: Fortifying Data in an Age of Relentless Hacking///The Unseen War: Hacking's Relentless Advance and the Imperative of Data Protection///The Evolving Threat Landscape: Hacking, Data Protection, and the Imperative for Proactive Security///Navigating the Digital Minefield: Bolstering Data Protection in an Era of Relentless Hacking///The Dual Fronts of Digital Defense: Combating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///Hacking's New Frontier: Fortifying Data Protection in the Age of Advanced Cyber Threats///The Dual Front: Navigating Hacking Threats and Fortifying Data Protection in the Digital Age///Navigating the Digital Gauntlet: The Evolving Nexus of Hacking and Data Protection///The Unrelenting Cyber Battle: Hacking Threats and the Imperative of Robust Data Protection///Navigating the Cyber Labyrinth: Bolstering Defenses Against Evolving Hacking Threats///The Dual Front War: Battling Hacking and Bolstering Data Protection in the Digital Age///The Ever-Evolving Cyber Threat Landscape: Navigating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///The Unseen Battle: Fortifying Data in an Age of Relentless Hacking///The Unseen War: Hacking's Relentless Advance and the Imperative of Data Protection///The Evolving Threat Landscape: Hacking, Data Protection, and the Imperative for Proactive Security///Navigating the Digital Minefield: Bolstering Data Protection in an Era of Relentless Hacking///The Dual Fronts of Digital Defense: Combating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///Hacking's New Frontier: Fortifying Data Protection in the Age of Advanced Cyber Threats///The Dual Front: Navigating Hacking Threats and Fortifying Data Protection in the Digital Age///Navigating the Digital Gauntlet: The Evolving Nexus of Hacking and Data Protection///
Subscribe
Cyber Security
Independent · Digital
Thehackingpost
CybersecurityAI-assisted

News|CourtsUS appeals court says Trump can send soldiers to Portland, OregonDissenting justice says decision ‘erodes core constitutional principles’ and risks violating freedom of expression.

A United States Court of Appeals has authorized the federal government to deploy military personnel to Portland, Oregon. This decision, issued on Mon, Sep 27, 2025, by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, permits the deployment of 200 National Guard…

A United States Court of Appeals has authorized the federal government to deploy military personnel to Portland, Oregon. This decision, issued on Mon, Sep 27, 2025, by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, permits the deployment of 200 National Guard members to the city.

The court noted, "After considering the record at this preliminary stage, we conclude that it is likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority" regarding the deployment of the state's National Guard.

The federal government has undertaken similar actions in other cities and conducted immigration enforcement operations involving federal agents. These operations have faced criticism for alleged racial profiling and civil liberties violations.

A United States Court of Appeals has authorized the federal government to deploy military personnel to Portland, Oregon.
Brooke Sanders · Thehackingpost

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) criticized the court's decision, asserting that the domestic deployment of troops should be reserved for rare, extreme emergencies. Hina Shamsi, Director of the ACLU’s National Security Project, stated, "The presence of troops in American cities erodes a sense of safety and undermines core freedoms." The ACLU highlighted concerns over the use of excessive force against demonstrators.

The administration has described Portland as "war-ravaged" by protesters who allegedly obstruct immigration enforcement, despite the absence of declared emergency conditions in the city.

Advertisement

Circuit Judge Susan Graber, in a dissenting opinion, criticized the ruling, stating it undermines constitutional principles and the rights of states and individuals.

Based on reporting by Al Jazeera.

AI transparency. This article was produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and published under human editorial oversight. AI systems can make mistakes. Read how we use AI (EU AI Act, Art. 50).
Related Stories