Tuesday, August 11, 2026
LIVEThe Unrelenting Cyber Battle: Hacking Threats and the Imperative of Robust Data Protection///Navigating the Cyber Labyrinth: Bolstering Defenses Against Evolving Hacking Threats///The Dual Front War: Battling Hacking and Bolstering Data Protection in the Digital Age///The Ever-Evolving Cyber Threat Landscape: Navigating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///The Unseen Battle: Fortifying Data in an Age of Relentless Hacking///The Unseen War: Hacking's Relentless Advance and the Imperative of Data Protection///The Evolving Threat Landscape: Hacking, Data Protection, and the Imperative for Proactive Security///Navigating the Digital Minefield: Bolstering Data Protection in an Era of Relentless Hacking///The Dual Fronts of Digital Defense: Combating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///Hacking's New Frontier: Fortifying Data Protection in the Age of Advanced Cyber Threats///The Dual Front: Navigating Hacking Threats and Fortifying Data Protection in the Digital Age///Navigating the Digital Gauntlet: The Evolving Nexus of Hacking and Data Protection///The Unrelenting Cyber Battle: Hacking Threats and the Imperative of Robust Data Protection///Navigating the Cyber Labyrinth: Bolstering Defenses Against Evolving Hacking Threats///The Dual Front War: Battling Hacking and Bolstering Data Protection in the Digital Age///The Ever-Evolving Cyber Threat Landscape: Navigating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///The Unseen Battle: Fortifying Data in an Age of Relentless Hacking///The Unseen War: Hacking's Relentless Advance and the Imperative of Data Protection///The Evolving Threat Landscape: Hacking, Data Protection, and the Imperative for Proactive Security///Navigating the Digital Minefield: Bolstering Data Protection in an Era of Relentless Hacking///The Dual Fronts of Digital Defense: Combating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///Hacking's New Frontier: Fortifying Data Protection in the Age of Advanced Cyber Threats///The Dual Front: Navigating Hacking Threats and Fortifying Data Protection in the Digital Age///Navigating the Digital Gauntlet: The Evolving Nexus of Hacking and Data Protection///
Subscribe
Cyber Security
Independent · Digital
Thehackingpost
CybersecurityAI-assisted

News|US-Venezuela TensionsUS faces war crime allegation for ‘disguising’ aircraft in drug boat attackThe New York Times says the US allegedly painted its military aircraft like a civilian plane to conduct a September strike.

On Mon, Dec 4, 2025, a report surfaced concerning the United States military allegedly disguising an aircraft as a civilian plane to conduct an attack on a suspected drug smuggling vessel originating from Venezuela. The incident reportedly occurred as…

On Mon, Dec 4, 2025, a report surfaced concerning the United States military allegedly disguising an aircraft as a civilian plane to conduct an attack on a suspected drug smuggling vessel originating from Venezuela. The incident reportedly occurred as part of a broader boat-bombing campaign initiated by the Trump administration on Thu, Sep 2, 2025, in the southern Caribbean Sea.

The aircraft involved in the operation was reportedly painted to resemble a civilian plane, with missiles concealed within the fuselage rather than displayed under the wings. This tactic could be considered an act of "perfidy," as outlined by international law governing armed conflict. Major General Steven Lepper, a retired deputy judge advocate general for the US Air Force, was quoted as indicating that such concealment might violate legal standards by obscuring military identity.

The Trump administration has justified the boat strikes as necessary measures to prevent illicit drug trafficking from reaching the United States from South America. In a memo to Congress, President Trump described the US engagement with drug cartels as a "non-international armed conflict," designating cartels as unlawful combatants. However, this classification lacks a recognized legal basis, as drug trafficking is a criminal offense, not equivalent to an armed attack.

This tactic could be considered an act of "perfidy," as outlined by international law governing armed conflict.
Allison Burke · Thehackingpost

International human rights experts, including those from the United Nations, have criticized the attacks as extrajudicial killings and potential violations of international law.

The report notes that after the initial attack, the US military shifted to using clearly marked military aircraft, such as MQ-9 Reaper drones, for subsequent operations. The Trump administration maintains that all military actions in the campaign are within the legal bounds of US authority, denying any illegal conduct throughout the operations.

Advertisement

Since the campaign's inception on September 2, at least 35 strikes have been executed in the Caribbean and the eastern Pacific Ocean, resulting in approximately 114 fatalities and one person presumed dead.

Based on reporting by Al Jazeera.

AI transparency. This article was produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and published under human editorial oversight. AI systems can make mistakes. Read how we use AI (EU AI Act, Art. 50).
Related Stories