Tuesday, August 11, 2026
LIVEThe Unrelenting Cyber Battle: Hacking Threats and the Imperative of Robust Data Protection///Navigating the Cyber Labyrinth: Bolstering Defenses Against Evolving Hacking Threats///The Dual Front War: Battling Hacking and Bolstering Data Protection in the Digital Age///The Ever-Evolving Cyber Threat Landscape: Navigating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///The Unseen Battle: Fortifying Data in an Age of Relentless Hacking///The Unseen War: Hacking's Relentless Advance and the Imperative of Data Protection///The Evolving Threat Landscape: Hacking, Data Protection, and the Imperative for Proactive Security///Navigating the Digital Minefield: Bolstering Data Protection in an Era of Relentless Hacking///The Dual Fronts of Digital Defense: Combating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///Hacking's New Frontier: Fortifying Data Protection in the Age of Advanced Cyber Threats///The Dual Front: Navigating Hacking Threats and Fortifying Data Protection in the Digital Age///Navigating the Digital Gauntlet: The Evolving Nexus of Hacking and Data Protection///The Unrelenting Cyber Battle: Hacking Threats and the Imperative of Robust Data Protection///Navigating the Cyber Labyrinth: Bolstering Defenses Against Evolving Hacking Threats///The Dual Front War: Battling Hacking and Bolstering Data Protection in the Digital Age///The Ever-Evolving Cyber Threat Landscape: Navigating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///The Unseen Battle: Fortifying Data in an Age of Relentless Hacking///The Unseen War: Hacking's Relentless Advance and the Imperative of Data Protection///The Evolving Threat Landscape: Hacking, Data Protection, and the Imperative for Proactive Security///Navigating the Digital Minefield: Bolstering Data Protection in an Era of Relentless Hacking///The Dual Fronts of Digital Defense: Combating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///Hacking's New Frontier: Fortifying Data Protection in the Age of Advanced Cyber Threats///The Dual Front: Navigating Hacking Threats and Fortifying Data Protection in the Digital Age///Navigating the Digital Gauntlet: The Evolving Nexus of Hacking and Data Protection///
Subscribe
Cyber Security
Independent · Digital
Thehackingpost
CybersecurityAI-assisted

OpenVPN Vulnerabilities Let Hackers Triggers Dos Attack and Bypass Security Checks

OpenVPN has released critical security updates for its 2.6 stable and 2.7 development branches, addressing three vulnerabilities that could lead to local denial-of-service (DoS) , security bypasses, and buffer over-reads.

OpenVPN has released critical security updates for its 2.6 stable and 2.7 development branches, addressing three vulnerabilities that could lead to local denial-of-service (DoS) , security bypasses, and buffer over-reads.

The patches, included in the newly released version 2.6.17 and 2.7_rc3, fix issues ranging from logic errors in HMAC verification to stability flaws in the Windows interactive service.

Administrators are urged to upgrade immediately, particularly those running OpenVPN on Windows or utilizing the 2.7 release candidates.​

Windows Interactive Service DoS (CVE-2025-13751)

The most significant issue for Windows environments is CVE-2025-13751 , a local denial-of-service vulnerability affecting the interactive service component.

The flaw involves an erroneous exit routine where the service shuts down completely upon encountering specific error conditions, rather than logging the error and continuing operations.​

This vulnerability can be triggered by any authenticated local user, making it a moderate risk for multi-user Windows systems.

Once triggered, the OpenVPN service terminates, preventing any new VPN connections until the service is manually restarted or the system is rebooted.
Nathan Cole · Thehackingpost

Once triggered, the OpenVPN service terminates, preventing any new VPN connections until the service is manually restarted or the system is rebooted. This issue affects OpenVPN versions 2.6.0 through 2.6.16 and 2.7_alpha1 through 2.7_rc2. It is resolved in 2.6.17 and 2.7_rc3.​

HMAC Verification Bypass (CVE-2025-13086)

A serious logic flaw, identified as CVE-2025-13086 , was found in the HMAC verification check used during the 3-way handshake. Due to an inverted memcmp() call in the code, the system inadvertently accepted all HMAC cookies, effectively neutralizing source IP address validation.​

This failure allows attackers to bypass the initial verification layer, potentially opening TLS sessions and consuming server state from IP addresses that did not initiate a legitimate connection.

The update also enforces stricter timeslot checks, rejecting HMACs from future timestamps. This vulnerability affects versions 2.6.0 through 2.6.15 and is fixed in 2.6.16 (and included in 2.6.17).​

Advertisement

IPv6 Buffer Over-Read (CVE-2025-12106)

For users on the development branch (2.7 series), CVE-2025-12106 presents a high-severity memory safety issue. The vulnerability stems from a mismatched address family check in the get_addr_generic function, which can lead to a heap buffer over-read when parsing invalid IPv6 input.​

While this flaw has been rated with a critical CVSS score of 9.1 in some reports due to its potential for memory corruption, it is strictly limited to the 2.7_alpha1 through 2.7_rc1 builds and does not affect the stable 2.6 branch.​

The following table summarizes the vulnerabilities and the required versions to mitigate them. Users on the stable branch should target 2.6.17, while testing branch users must update to 2.7_rc3.

CVE IDVulnerability TypeImpactAffected VersionsFixed InCVE-2025-13751Local DoSService crash on Windows2.6.0–2.6.162.7_alpha1–2.7_rc22.6.172.7_rc3CVE-2025-13086Security BypassHMAC check failure2.6.0–2.6.152.7_alpha1–2.7_rc12.6.162.7_rc2CVE-2025-12106Buffer Over-readInvalid IPv6 parsing2.7_alpha1–2.7_rc12.7_rc2 Follow us on Google News , LinkedIn , and X for daily cybersecurity updates. Contact us to feature your stories.

Based on reporting by Cyber Security News.

AI transparency. This article was produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and published under human editorial oversight. AI systems can make mistakes. Read how we use AI (EU AI Act, Art. 50).
Related Stories