Tuesday, August 11, 2026
LIVEThe Unrelenting Cyber Battle: Hacking Threats and the Imperative of Robust Data Protection///Navigating the Cyber Labyrinth: Bolstering Defenses Against Evolving Hacking Threats///The Dual Front War: Battling Hacking and Bolstering Data Protection in the Digital Age///The Ever-Evolving Cyber Threat Landscape: Navigating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///The Unseen Battle: Fortifying Data in an Age of Relentless Hacking///The Unseen War: Hacking's Relentless Advance and the Imperative of Data Protection///The Evolving Threat Landscape: Hacking, Data Protection, and the Imperative for Proactive Security///Navigating the Digital Minefield: Bolstering Data Protection in an Era of Relentless Hacking///The Dual Fronts of Digital Defense: Combating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///Hacking's New Frontier: Fortifying Data Protection in the Age of Advanced Cyber Threats///The Dual Front: Navigating Hacking Threats and Fortifying Data Protection in the Digital Age///Navigating the Digital Gauntlet: The Evolving Nexus of Hacking and Data Protection///The Unrelenting Cyber Battle: Hacking Threats and the Imperative of Robust Data Protection///Navigating the Cyber Labyrinth: Bolstering Defenses Against Evolving Hacking Threats///The Dual Front War: Battling Hacking and Bolstering Data Protection in the Digital Age///The Ever-Evolving Cyber Threat Landscape: Navigating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///The Unseen Battle: Fortifying Data in an Age of Relentless Hacking///The Unseen War: Hacking's Relentless Advance and the Imperative of Data Protection///The Evolving Threat Landscape: Hacking, Data Protection, and the Imperative for Proactive Security///Navigating the Digital Minefield: Bolstering Data Protection in an Era of Relentless Hacking///The Dual Fronts of Digital Defense: Combating Hacking and Fortifying Data Protection///Hacking's New Frontier: Fortifying Data Protection in the Age of Advanced Cyber Threats///The Dual Front: Navigating Hacking Threats and Fortifying Data Protection in the Digital Age///Navigating the Digital Gauntlet: The Evolving Nexus of Hacking and Data Protection///
Subscribe
Cyber Security
Independent · Digital
Thehackingpost
CybersecurityAI-assisted

Reports Found Meta Approved Unorthorised AI Chatbots On The App

Meta has faced scrutiny following findings that its platforms hosted numerous chatbots impersonating well-known celebrities, producing intimate images, and sometimes posing as children without consent from the individuals they represented.

Meta has faced scrutiny following findings that its platforms hosted numerous chatbots impersonating well-known celebrities, producing intimate images, and sometimes posing as children without consent from the individuals they represented.

Over several weeks, testing revealed that many chatbots claimed to be real actors or musicians, made inappropriate advances, and generated lifelike images of celebrities such as Taylor Swift, Scarlett Johansson, Anne Hathaway, and Selena Gomez.

Meta acknowledged that the avatars should not have generated such content. While the company allows the use of public figures in AI images, its policies prohibit nude or sexually suggestive material. Approximately a dozen bots were subsequently removed, with some being marked as parody and others not.

While many avatars were created by users experimenting with Meta's tools, investigations revealed that a Meta employee also created celebrity bots, including two versions of Taylor Swift and avatars of British race car driver Lewis Hamilton. These avatars were involved in over 10 million conversations before being deleted following inquiries.

Meta acknowledged that the avatars should not have generated such content.
Carter Hartwell · Thehackingpost

A concerning case involved a chatbot representing child actor Walker Scobell, which generated realistic images of the teenager. Meta's guidelines explicitly forbid inappropriate depictions of minors and impersonation of celebrities unless clearly marked as parody, yet these rules were not enforced.

Meta has previously faced criticism in a related investigation that found chatbots could engage in romantic conversations with children, leading to a U.S. Senate inquiry and a call from 44 attorneys general for stronger youth protections. Meta later stated such guidance was erroneous and promised corrections.

Legal experts have raised questions about the legality of using a person's likeness for commercial gain without permission. California's "right of publicity" law prohibits such actions, and it remains unclear whether labeling the avatars as parody provides sufficient legal protection. Representatives for some affected celebrities are considering responses, and industry professionals have warned of potential safety risks associated with such AI-generated avatars.

Advertisement

Meta has acknowledged enforcement failures and has removed the problematic avatars. The company has committed to enhancing its AI training and safety policies to prevent similar issues, including prohibiting chatbots from engaging in certain types of conversations with teenagers. These changes are expected to be accompanied by broader policy updates.

Based on reporting by techround.co.uk.

AI transparency. This article was produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and published under human editorial oversight. AI systems can make mistakes. Read how we use AI (EU AI Act, Art. 50).
Related Stories